music licensing ni asia

Music Licensing in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand for Business: Best Proven Routes

TL;DR

Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand are often grouped together commercially, but venue operators shouldn’t assume they work the same way for music licensing. Singapore openly reflects a split between the musical works and sound-recording side. Malaysia’s official framework recognises separate music CMOs. Thailand is still a market where venues should verify the actual current route and repertoire coverage carefully, even though the front end may be getting easier.

Questions about music licensing in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand for business therefore need separate country-level answers even when the venues belong to the same regional operator.

music licensing in Singapore Malaysia and Thailand for business

Why music licensing in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand for business still needs country-by-country thinking

These three markets belong together only in a practical publishing sense. For venue operators, the customer journey and rights structure are still different enough that each country needs its own section inside the article.

The common question is the same everywhere: can my business play this music publicly? The answer, however, travels through different organisations and different levels of customer clarity.

Singapore

Singapore is one of the clearest examples of a split rights structure being explained openly to music users. COMPASS publicly states that businesses providing music to the public require a licence from COMPASS for musical works. At the same time, public guidance also makes clear that COMPASS and MRSS administer different rights.

For many ordinary recorded-use cases, the practical issue is whether the venue needs a COMPASS MRSS licence combination rather than assuming one layer solves everything.

That matters because a venue using live music may have a simpler rights path than a venue using recorded music through speakers. Public FAQ guidance in Singapore specifically says that a retail or F&B venue playing mechanical recorded music may also need a MRSS public performance licence, depending on the recordings involved. So the correct practical rule in Singapore is not ‘get one licence and assume you’re done’. It’s ‘check whether your venue needs the musical works side, the sound-recording side, or both.’

Malaysia

Malaysia’s official framework also points venue operators away from oversimplified answers. MyIPO publicly recognises MACP, PPM, and RPM as collective management organisations and also notes that the earlier Music Rights Malaysia declaration was revoked. For a venue operator, that’s a strong signal not to rely on older market assumptions.

In practical terms, questions about business music licensing through MACP, PPM and RPM turn on which body, or combination of bodies, covers the actual rights your venue needs for its specific use.

The practical question in Malaysia is therefore not whether public music use needs licensing. It does. The more useful question is which rights body, or combination of bodies, covers the actual rights your venue needs for its specific use.

Thailand

Thailand is still a market where venue operators should be careful with broad claims. MCT publicly positions itself as the collective management organisation for musical works and identifies Phonoright on the sound-recording side in its public FAQs. WIPO has also noted that MCT and Phonoright created a one-stop licensing unit called MPC for business users seeking both music and performance rights.

From an operator’s perspective, questions about venue music licensing through MCT and Phonoright in Thailand should still be approached as a route that may be improving, but not one that should be treated as automatically frictionless for every repertoire or use case.

That’s promising from a customer-experience perspective, but venues shouldn’t jump from that headline to the assumption that every repertoire and use case is now frictionless. Thailand is best approached as a market where the route may be improving, but where checking the current scope of coverage is still essential.

What venue operators in all three markets should do about music licensing in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand for business

  • Identify whether the venue is using live music, recorded music, or both
  • Confirm whether the rights route for musical works is separate from the sound-recording route
  • Check whether any current one-stop or combined route really covers the repertoire you plan to use
  • Make sure the source platform or supplier terms also allow the intended commercial use

The safest regional process is not to centralise assumptions, but to document the answer separately for each market.

A practical takeaway for regional operators

If you operate across Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand, don’t centralise assumptions. Centralise the process instead. For each market, identify the customer-facing route, confirm the rights layers involved, and document the answer separately.

That is the safest way to handle music licensing in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand for business without pretending the region works as a single system.

FAQs

Is Singapore a one-licence market for ordinary recorded music in venues?

Not necessarily. Public guidance makes clear that COMPASS and MRSS administer different rights, and some venues may need to think about both.

Can Malaysian venues rely on old assumptions about MRM?

No. MyIPO publicly notes that the earlier MRM declaration was revoked, so venues should work from the current recognised framework.

Is Thailand now fully one-window?

It may be moving in that direction for some users, but venues should still verify the actual scope and repertoire coverage rather than assuming everything is automatically covered.

What does music licensing in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand for business usually require in practice?

Usually, it requires country-specific checking of the customer-facing route, the rights layers involved, and whether the available path actually covers the repertoire and use case the venue has in mind.

Disclaimer

This post is intended as general information only and is not legal advice. Music licensing requirements can vary by country, venue type, and use case, and they may change over time. Before playing music in your venue, check directly with the relevant licensing organisations or authorised bodies in your country to confirm what permissions your business needs.

Alenka brings your brand to life across platforms, with music and digital signage services that are committed to your business success.

Get It On

Background Music

DIgital Signage

All copyrights and intellectual property rights remain the property of the original content owners. Samples are provided for illustrative and demo purposes only. Alenka Media makes no claim to ownership of such content.

© Alenka Media 2025. All Rights Reserved.